Les Paul vs. SG - The Gibson Lounge - Gibson Brands Forums
Oct 28, 2012 · Les Paul: Pros - More versatile, thicker sound, more accurate sound when covering most artists (since they were used by so many), more performance-worthy (lack of neck-dive present on the SG), better looking in terms of mysteriousness & shape, a statement.
SG vs Les Paul? - The Gibson Lounge - Gibson Brands Forums
Jun 27, 2014 · Les Paul's have more "bass" response=thicker tone all things set equal, to the SG! ES-335, 345, 355, (basically) have that semi-hollow body (warmth, and roundness, but very similar tone, beyond that, to the Les Paul. The SG is still a bit "edgier," or has a more "sharp" (bite), than. either the Les Paul or ES-models with the same electronics ...
SG vs Les Paul Tone - Gibson USA - Gibson Brands Forums
Sep 4, 2012 · The Les Paul, I found heavy, unbalanced, single cutaway a real limiter if you like octaves. That alone did it for me. sg has access without distorting your wrist, arm ect. Double cutaways are not for everyone, but they really are easier for some, me included. Les Paul double cutaways that I have played are fabulous. They are a better buy too imo.
best website for serial number search - Gibson Brands Forums
May 22, 2010 · I just bought a new Les Paul Standard and would like you to check the serial number for me: 91029466 I want to verify the year of manufacture, whether it has a 60's neck and the color. Thank you.
SG '61 Reissue - Reviews - Gibson Brands Forums
Feb 7, 2008 · Gibson has probably introduced more original body styles than any other guitar company, the Les Paul, SG, Flying V, and Explorer to name a few. These are without a doubt the most copied guitars ever. Of those the SG has been a solid staple in Gibson's arsenal since its introduction in 1961. Its d...
62 Les Paul SG - Gibson USA - Gibson Brands Forums
Feb 19, 2014 · I have a 62 Les Paul SG that I bought as a kid back in 1972 from a music store where the owner told me the original owner had traded it in. Have had it since. All original as purchased. It has a bigsby tailpiece on it, and the store owner told me that was factory original, but I have never seen a...
SG vs. Les Paul - Gibson USA - Gibson Brands Forums
Jun 7, 2015 · Where the Les Paul body can be very heavy the SG body is so light you experience "neck drop" if you don't support the neck with your fretting hand. Les Paul necks, even the '60's slim contour, feel thicker than the neck of an SG. SG's are solid mahogany and "double cut" where Les Pauls are "single cut", mahogany bodied with a maple top.
NGD - 1964 Gibson SG Standard Reissue
Nov 14, 2021 · Ever since I got a Custom Shop Les Paul a few years ago, I've been slowly working to replace all my Gibson USA guitars to its Custom Shop counterparts and it was time for the SG to make the leap. I went to Chicago for RiotFest a few months ago in hopes of finding the Custom Shop SG that would replace my 2015 SGS3, but I could not find any that ...
SG vs. Les Paul - Epiphone Electrics - Gibson Brands Forums
Sep 1, 2008 · My Gibson SG Classic almost has a baseball bat style neck. Very fat. (it's nice) Had a G. SG Standard years back that had a very thin neck, too thin for someone so heavy handed as myself. Really exposed the neck joint issue for me. Prefer the fatter SG Classic neck- that guitar is solid. My Gibson Les Paul Classic has the 60's thin tapered neck.
Gibson headstock with "stinger" Les Paul and SG
Apr 4, 2008 · The Stinger Series Gibson Les Paul 1959 Historic Reissues also came with a 1959 Gibson Les Paul neck. This neck size seems to be the most satisfactory neck size for the consumers that Music Machine has the opportunity to talk with. But a lot of other neck sizes were built into the Stinger Series 1959 Gibson Les Paul models