The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
The US Supreme Court has once again refused to overturn an oft-criticized rule that bars soldiers from suing the federal ...
US Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas attends inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the US Capitol on ...
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
None are quite as eyebrow raising as the teenager know as “Big Balls,” but the group is still relatively young.
It is painfully clear that President Donald Trump is attempting to whitewash America’s past. He is glossing over the worst ...
The US Supreme Court appointed Kirkland & Ellis partner Kasdin Mitchell to argue a technical criminal matter, after the federal government said it agreed with the defendant’s argument.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback