The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
The justices have all but stopped issuing summary reversals, which are unsigned decisions used to correct clear errors by ...
The US Supreme Court has once again refused to overturn an oft-criticized rule that bars soldiers from suing the federal ...
Americans concerned about LGBTQ equality are working on enshrining marriage equality rights in state governing documents.
Democrats have long opposed honoring Thomas, a Georgia native who was accused of sexual harassment during his 1991 confirmation hearing.
The Supreme Court on Thursday appointed a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas to argue in a case involving the application of the federal laws governing post-conviction relief for federal ...
The Trump administration fired Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, who sued to overturn the decision.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback